<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theredwhiteandgreen.com/2009/02/17/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theredwhiteandgreen.com/2009/02/17/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/</link>
	<description>Caring about the environment is patriotic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Grayson</title>
		<link>http://www.theredwhiteandgreen.com/2009/02/17/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Grayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theredwhiteandgreen.com/?p=57#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>Ha ha. No, you haven&#039;t missed something -- Chanel isn&#039;t exactly known as groundbreaker in eco-conscious fashion. You could make the argument though, that investing in top-notch classics that will stand the test of time (like a Chanel bag) is an inherently greener choice than buying &quot;eco-friendly&quot; goods that may be made of synthetic materials (in the case of a lot of vegan fashion) and won&#039;t be cool beyond next season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha. No, you haven&#8217;t missed something &#8212; Chanel isn&#8217;t exactly known as groundbreaker in eco-conscious fashion. You could make the argument though, that investing in top-notch classics that will stand the test of time (like a Chanel bag) is an inherently greener choice than buying &#8220;eco-friendly&#8221; goods that may be made of synthetic materials (in the case of a lot of vegan fashion) and won&#8217;t be cool beyond next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sangria</title>
		<link>http://www.theredwhiteandgreen.com/2009/02/17/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Sangria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theredwhiteandgreen.com/?p=57#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Ooops, yes, that´s simply embarassing..but - I went to the link and saw the photo and this text belonging to it (desribing items model is wearing in the picture)

Eco-Chic Fashion
Jacket, price upon request, bracelet, $1015, bag, $1895, Chanel; top, $28, Alternative Earth; jeans, $69.50, Levi&#039;s; sunglasses, $129, Ray-Ban.

So what is wrong? Chanel and eco-chic?! Have I missed something?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, yes, that´s simply embarassing..but &#8211; I went to the link and saw the photo and this text belonging to it (desribing items model is wearing in the picture)</p>
<p>Eco-Chic Fashion<br />
Jacket, price upon request, bracelet, $1015, bag, $1895, Chanel; top, $28, Alternative Earth; jeans, $69.50, Levi&#8217;s; sunglasses, $129, Ray-Ban.</p>
<p>So what is wrong? Chanel and eco-chic?! Have I missed something?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathy banks</title>
		<link>http://www.theredwhiteandgreen.com/2009/02/17/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theredwhiteandgreen.com/?p=57#comment-4</guid>
		<description>TOTALLY!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOTALLY!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

